There are many other incredible stories

 Art Restoration Miracles (and Disasters)

 While art restoration has not been a trendy subject, recent failures were so spectacular that they became to the top of the list. We've all seen it.

 the memes of disastrous attempts to restore Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph  historical (often religious) works of art -- Ecce Homo and Immaculate Conception being perhaps the two most

 famous that led to Spain making a decision to change the laws governing restoration of art in 2020. There are many other incredible stories.

 You will find artworks in terrible condition and art restorations that went horribly (and sometimes hilariously!) awry.

 Did you hear about the Christo pieces which were in Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph  the customs office unwrapped? True story. or the Las Vegas casino proprietor and billionaire Steve

 Wynn accidently let his elbow go through a Picasso that was worth more than $130 million. Or, the "starving artists" who consumed the banana-duct tape that was attached to his wall (also known).

 as Comedian by Maurizio Cattelan) at Art Basel Miami in 2019? The last one ended with an unusually happy conclusion as the gallery that featured the work was the one who chose to display the work.

 Emmanuel Perrotin, ultimately declined to press Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph  charges against the artist who claimed that he was doing the act due to being "hungry" and turned into an instant internet

 sensation.

 Who is scared of art restoration?

 The delightful podcast 99% invisible includes a fun Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph  episode entitled "The many deaths of painting" and it's about the artist Who's Afraid of

 Red, Yellow and Blue III Blue III, created by American post-war artist Barnett Newman. The work is a minimalist design which uses just three primary colours -- but

 The predominant red color -- so offensive to visitors of Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph  Amsterdam's Stedelijk Museum (which acquired it in 1969), that many recounted their experiences.

 Physically ill or enraged at the sight of.

 Gerard Jan van Bladeren, then a struggling artist of 30 years, attacked the painting in the 1980s while it was on display.

 The center of the canvas. According to reports "When      Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph  the slashes are added together, they measure nearly fifty feet." But, this only the.

 The beginning of the tale. As the painting was being repaired, it proved just as controversial and controversial as vandalism.

 The restoration process took four years. It eventually cost the museum more than $1 million.

 Daniel Goldreyer is the conservator of work. Goldreyer Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph Agile Morph  was initially hired by Stedelijk, assured that he could fix the work "within 98 percent."

 Accuracy.

 without the "shimmering appearance to the red that gave it a sense of depth" before the attack.

 The Stedelijk forensically investigated the painting, and were informed by the restorer that he had used a basic brush roller to paint it.

 He also claimed that the entire canvas was covered in matte house paint. The claim was categorically rejected. The result was noticeably different, but it maintained the same spirit.

 effect.