Due Dates for Assignment 1 - Term 2 are staggered based on course materials, so choose your assignment carefully, and pay attention to due dates!
- Text Analysis II
- Length: 1000 -1200 words
- Due: Wednesday, Feb. 1 by noon
- Point value: 10
- Details: see below
- Film Review
- Topic: "Belle" (Amma Asante, UK, 2013)
- This option is due at the end of our lesson on the Practices of Slavery
- Length: 1000 -1200 words
- Due: Wednesday, Feb. 15 by noon
- Point value: 10
- Details: see below
Option 1 - Text Analysis II: Due Wednesday February 1, noon
Compare Two Captivity Narratives, Mary Rowlandson vs. John Gyles
In this exercise, we want you to read and compare two colonial North American texts. But we want you to read them in a particular manner. In our first Voyant assignment, we asked you to approach the text using Voyant and experiment. This time, we would like you to think a little more strategically about how Voyant might help you when you know a little bit about the type of sources you are using, but not necessarily their contents. So, approach the texts in the following manner:
Use Voyant tools (and your mind!) to compare two texts.
First, read Linda Colley's selection from Captives : Britain, Empire and the World, 1600-1850 to help you consider ways to approach the texts through Voyant. Colley offers valuable insight into the generic conventions of captivity narratives and the roles they played in empire building in the Atlantic world. Second, "pre-read" the texts, using only their titles, publication information and your now developing general knowledge, and then using text-mining software (Voyant) as a way to examine the patterns of topics and ideas present in each text: can these "pre-reads" allow you to hypothesize about these texts? To develop questions by which you might approach reading them? Then, finally, read the texts with an eye to both reading them critically and intelligently (as you alway would) but also to testing your hypotheses. Write 1000-1200 words about how you used at least two tools from Voyant Tools to "pre-read" these texts, and then read and discuss the texts in light of your pre-reading. Make sure that you include URLs to the output pages of the data analyses and tools that you are describing, and connect your ideas to wider course themes.
Your texts are about two New Englanders captured in late 17th-century wars in northeastern North America, and they belong to a specific genre of text known as captivity narratives. Mary Rowlandson was captured in 1676 during King Philips War, while Gyles was captured in 1690 by Mailseet peoples on what is today the Saint John River in New Brunswick. Rowlandson’s account is far more famous (and why is a good question you might ask yourself!), but they are both very similar and very different.
Text-mining software like Voyant allow us to "read" text in new and interesting ways. Many of you have already explored this type of reading in earlier assignments. These tools count, organise, and visually represent writing. It allows one to read enter works, even multiple works, that can help us identify patterns of word use, key terms, themes, and even the organisation of ideas and arguments.
Pre-reading allows us to identify important features of these books. To be clear, we still need to read - the software only helps us spot patterns, not doing the actual reading - but it allows us to anticipate language, conceptual terms, associations of ideas, sections of the book where some ideas are present, or not.
Hint: I've given you a video showing you the basics of comparing two texts in Voyant, but you can also use Voyant on each of these texts, one-by-one, to get a handle on each before you move on to the comparison.
Our readings and discussions , plus these additional readings, should offer you a strong historical context from which to begin your journey into Voyant Tools.
The TextsJohn Gyles, Memoirs of odd adventures, strange deliverances, &c. in the captivity of John Gyles, esq. commander of the garrison on St. George's river (Boston, Kneeland, 1736). [plain text file]
Mary Rowlandson, The soveraignty & goodness of God: together, with the faithfulness of his promises displayed: being a narrative of the captivity and restauration of Mrs. Mary Rowlandson(Cambridge, Green, 1682). [plain text file]
Additional Sources for contextColley, Linda. Captives : Britain, Empire and the World, 1600-1850. 1st Anchor Books ed. New York: Anchor Books, 2004. (the relevant section is subtitled "Taking Captives", pp 141-52, but I have provided you with the whole chapter for those interested in reading more.)
Note: This assignment is very similar to the assignment last term, so review the Term 1 Assignment 2 instructions for additional information on Voyant. The key difference is in the comparison between the two texts this time!
Write an essay, 1000-1200 words, due 1 February, no later than noon (EDT)
Option 2 - Film Review: Due Wednesday February 15, noon
"Belle" (Amma Asante, UK, 2013)
Using the knowledge and skills you've acquired in this course, review this historical film.
A fan of Bridgerton? The very popular British TV series completely reimagines the Regency Era Britain in a very contemporary style, most notably (or at least most ranted about on social media!) the racial "look" of that era. You might think I hate Bridgerton because I'm a historian and its use of history is shaky. Nope. I think it's fun, weird, but fun - and. moreover it makes no pretence of being historically accurate. It's playing with a genre. Some of you may have seen Quintin Tarrentino's "Django Unchanged". For me, it's the same thing: it's not trying to be "historically accurate - it's trying to tell an interesting story in an unconventional way. An obvious comparison is Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln", a film that got all the details right, but portrayed the struggle over slavery as one fought out in Washington. Django showed clearly that slavery continued to exist because white men were prepared to resort to extreme violence to preserve their world. That, it seems to me, gets at a far greater historical truth than making sure the costumes are period accurate.
While this is neither Bridgerton, nor Django, it is both better (it does the historical accuracy part very well) and not as good (it's not as adventuresome). But it does, I think, a pretty good job of retelling a true story in a popular, accessible manner. It's a love story, and a history lesson, wrapped with a big Georgian bow.The film is framed as much as a romance as it is an account of colonial life, and some critics have certainly noted that the film seems a tad sugar-coated. Having said that, I'd say the director is genuinely trying to make the film as historically accurate as she can. We'll leave you to discuss how well she does that, but I think at minimum we can say that it offers a reasonable reimagining of a fascinating story. Were Black people rare in 18th-century Britain? They certainly weren't common, and perhaps even less so among the country's elite. But they were far from rare, even among the country's elite. A recent book by historian Daniel Livesay, Children of Uncertain Fortune Mixed-Race Jamaicans in Britain and the Atlantic Family, 1733-1833 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2018) follows hundreds of children born to white planters and Caribbean women of colour (very often enslaved) who then crossed the Atlantic for education, business opportunities, or simply to escape the extreme prejudices of the colonial world. It answers one part of the Bridgerton question: did elite Black people live in Georgian Britain? Yes. Of course, he didn't set out to prove that point, but he does give ua a much richer account of racial complexities on the eastern side of Atlantic world.
The film is not, however, without controversy. Many critics, for example, have pointed out that while broadly accurate - like many films this one begins “the historical events represented in this story are true” - the film has a highly idealised take on how we should understand that story. And you are now in a good place to assess that film. You've by now read some work on women, slavery, the enslaved, and on the emerging politics both for and against the slave trade. Using your new background, review the film as a historian.
Using the material available to you - both the materials you read for our slavery lessons, and the sources included with this assignment - discuss this film’s interpretation of this true story as it connects to our course themes. The Ben Franklin's World podcast with Livesay included with this assignment, will prove especially helpful in thinking about how the film depicts race and family relationships in Georgian England. To be clear, you don’t need to get into all the intrigues of British politics and so on. That part of the story is told reasonably accurately; it simplifies the story, for sure, but that’s necessary in a film like this.
What I want you to focus on the film's more important representation: the relationship between Belle and the elite British world she finds herself in. Does the film offer a historically sound representation of such an Atlantic world life? Does it help us think about the world of slavery, race, and freedom in early modern Britain?
Watch the film during or after after we've completed our lesson on the practice of slavery. I want you to watch the film thinking with what we've learned about slavery, about women in colonial societies, about the enslaved (particularly women), and about the place of slavery in early modern Britain. None of our documents are about this person (though one is about a real-life event in the film). We've added some additional readings noted below, and expect you to incorporate them into your review. Our readings and discussions , plus these additional readings, should offer you a strong historical context from which to review this film.
You may find the following link helpful to provide you with the basic structure of a film review (it is a suggesstion, not a rubric), but remember, you are writing about the film as an historian. It may help to think of your audience as other historians as you reflect on the film..would you recommend it to them. As good historians, remember, when you cite knowledge you acquired in this course, you should cite the source as a good historian would.
"Belle", (dir. Amma Assante) Britain, 2014.
Additional Primary sources:
- An Insurance Case, findings at trial 1783.
- The portrait (above)
Additional secondary sources:
- Belle [married name Davinier], Dido Elizabeth (1761?–1804) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography [UK]
- Germann, Jennifer "Other Women Were Present": Seeing Black Women in Georgian London Eighteenth - Century Studies; Baltimor Vol. 54, Iss. 3, (Spring 2021): 535-553.
- Podcast: Daniel Livesay, Mixed-Race Britons and the Atlantic Family Ben Franklin's World, episode 236, April 2019.
Write an essay, 1000-1200 words, due 15 February, no later than noon (EDT)
Version 172 of this page, updated 2022-06-27 | All versions | Metadata