Rulers and Subjects (1)
This week's big question
How did early modern Europeans justify political inequality (i.e., the rule of kings and queens)?
Video introductionThis week's video introduction comes from the History Hub Project at Royal Holloway University in London. In it, Dr. Claire Kennan will introduce you to some of the key relationships that informed late medieval and early modern European social structure. While feudalism itself, is a nineteenth-century term that historians debate for its historical accuracy, it does present a lens through which we can begin to examine the shifts in power that occur between 1400-1850.
By the end of this week you should be able to:
- describe how the the groups in the estate model of society were supposed to function together in an ideal vision of European political order;
- explain how the estates model of society related to pre-modern European ideas about nature and God as outlined in the Great Chain of Being;
- analyze the primary documents and explain to what extent they are related to the estates model of society and the Great Chain of Being.
Questions to consider, and learning activityIn addition to the Big Question for every week's Lesson, we will often include a series of more detailed questions that should help you develop your thoughts on that Big Question. For this week, these particular questions are:
- Compare the writings of Elizabeth I, James VI/I and Bossuet. Do the three authors' views reflect the same view of early modern government? If so, in what ways? If not, how are they different?
- How, if at all, are these documents related to the estates model of society and/or the idea of the Great Chain of Being?
Note: No single post can answer the Big Question for the Lesson, or even all aspects of the particular questions. Therefore, your goal in each of your posts should be to identify and answer a part of a question. You do this by focusing your answer on one or a small group of sources, because all good historical answers are based on sources. You should also remember to build upon, not repeat, the answers that have come before your posts in your Forum Group.
BackgroundCitizens and their representatives versus subjects and their rulers
In Canada (as in other modern democracies) we think of the country's citizens to be the ultimate source of political legitimacy. Citizens vote to express their collective will, and the members of parliament they elect have a duty to represent them in the federal parliament in Ottawa. All Canadians of voting age (including most, if not all, of the students in this course) have the right to vote for their elected leaders. As citizens vote to express their collective will, the members of parliament they elect, have a duty to represent them in the federal parliament in Ottawa.
The model of political power based on citizens and their representatives was not the dominant one in medieval and early modern Europe (that is, during the period that we study in this course). Democracy is an ancient idea, but most early democracies were limited to very small political communities (usually cities), and citizenship was limited to landowning (i.e., fairly wealthy) men. Under these rules, most of the students in the course would not be allowed to vote!
Instead, the most dominant model of political power in the early modern era revolved around the concept of monarchical rule. In some cases, the monarch held absolute power, and in other, the monarch's power relied on parliamentary support. These lines were by no means absolute, nor unchallenged, as you will read in our next lesson! Monarchs were also assisted and advised by those born into positions of privilege and authority, and they were thought of as a separate class: the nobility. Today, the word "class" often has an economic meaning; we are a member of the working, middle or upper classes, depending on how much money we earn or have. In medieval and early modern Europe, however, class had a different range of meanings, the most significant of which were based on family status, not earnings. Family status determined to a very large extent the kinds of opportunities that a person could enjoy in a lifetime, despite their economic standing . The widely-held view was that members of the nobility (a minority) were born to rule, while the majority of the people were born to obey their social superiors. In other words, the majority was made up not of citizens but rather of subjects.
In this week's Lesson you will learn about important elements of the intellectual foundations for the authority of European rulers. Be aware that these were ideals, which means that these ideas were the way the writers and thinkers who we'll be reading thought the world should be organized. However, ideals are not always the ways things really are. You should keep this potential tension between ideal and reality in mind as you read about the estates model of society and the Great Chain of Being. For this week's Lesson, it is enough for you to do your best to make sense of what for most of us today will be very strange ideals. If you are going to do your job of understanding past ideals effectively, you will have to do your very best to avoid judging the views you will be trying to learn.
The three primary sources that you will be reading speak to some of these ideals. Pay close attention to how each author expresses her/his relationship with them.
ToolboxIn the Course Introduction we emphasized that history is not the past but rather questions that we ask of sources from the past. Since we are currently unable to time travel, we can only ever understand the past through the fragments left behind by those who lived then. These surviving fragments only provide us with brief glimpses into past moments, but by connected them in conversation with one another, historians (and that includes all of you in this course!) begin to reconstruct the past.
In the first Toolbox in the Course Introduction you learned about the basic concepts of historical thinking. These concepts help you break down the steps that we use in studying the past so that you do a better job at asking questions and searching for answers -- a little bit like a detective might when searching through clues to solve a mystery. In this week's Toolbox we'll look more closely as four aspects of the use of evidence from primary sources.
The most basic and important skill all historians practice is the analysis of primary source evidence. If you have ever taken a history course in university before, then you have probably begun to practice with this skill, but may not have really considered skills you were practicing. If we break down the analysis of primary sources into four parts, we are left with the following:
- close reading,
- corroboration, and
This week in your Forums you should practice applying these four skills when you discuss your answers to the particular questions about the primary sources. (Note: we will be pushing to to think about which skills you are applying!) How do you do this? Try to answer questions such as the ones on the posters below whenever you read primary sources and write about them.
How do you apply these skills when you write in the Forums? Here are some examples of how you can "source" your evidence:
- "In his 1709 treatise about royal authority, Bousset argued that..."
- "In x ways Elizabeth I's speech to the English Parliament is similar to [or different from] James I of England's speech from several years later."
- "The Wikipedia article on xxx suggests that ______, a point which is illustrated by [primary source yyy]."
- "While Steven Kreis argues in 'Medieval Society: The Three Orders' that ____, evidence from [primary source aaa] seems to present a more complicated picture."
You should focus on the following primary sources in your answers to questions in the Forum this week, but also take a closer look at the images on this page. Do you see ways to connect them with any of our readings?
The texts include 3 excerpts from early modern texts by 3 authors.
- Jacques–Benigne Bossuet, The Nature and Properties of Royal Authority, 1709
- James VI and I, True Law of Free Monarchies, 1598 and 1603; and a speech before the English Parliament, 1610
- Elizabeth I, Farewell Speech before the English Parliament (1601)
Read the following secondary sources to help you understand and contextualize the primary sources. You should practice reading the sources "critically" (not to be confused with "negatively"). Critical reading, like critical and historical thinking, is careful and discerning, and is aimed at understanding an author's views in a fair and full way. Use these sources, and the video introduction to help you think through the sources.
When you read critically you are constantly asking questions of the text. For example: Does the evidence in the source support or complicate the answer to a question that you are proposing? Are there other explanations that the evidence allows? You've read some additional primary sources. Do these sources help you think about your questions and answers differently?
- "Estates of the Realm," Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Estates_of_the_realm).
- "Great Chain of Being," Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_chain_of_being).
- Kreis, Steven. “Medieval Society: The Three Orders,” from Kreis, The History Guide: Lectures on Ancient and Medieval European History (http://historyguide.org/ancient/lecture23b.html) (2001).
If you're interested in learning more about medieval history, check out courses offered by Prof. Andrew McDonald of Brock University's History Department. Prof. McDonald is an expert in early British history, and among the courses he offers are:
- HIST 2P03, Early Medieval Britain 400-1000: Celts, Saxons and Vikings;
- HIST 2P04, The Medieval British Isles, 1000-1485; and
- HIST 3P30, The Viking Age.