Colonial Canada: Canadian history in the early modern eraMain MenuColonial CanadaCanadian history in the early modern era.The SyllabusIntroductionLet's talk about historical arguments and evidenceModule 1: Indigenous-Settler Relations and Early New FranceFur Traders and their Prey, 17th to 19th centuriesModule 2: French Canada, Acadia, and the Mi'kmaqModule 3: Slavery and Unfreedom in Early CanadaRace, Empire, and SlaveryModule 4: War and Revolutions in AmericaModule 5: Indigenous-Settler TreatiesModule 6: Loyalists and Protestantism (but it's really about sex)Module 7: Immigration and Reform in British North AmericaModule 8: Liberalism and Social Change in British North AmericaModule 9: Economic Change and the Role of the StateWriting WorkshopExam ReviewSandboxDaniel Samsone78c44be69204bf85874703732765155352152aa
The British Governments in North America (London, 1763)
1media/24498.jpg_thumb.png2020-10-07T14:23:18+00:00Daniel Samsone78c44be69204bf85874703732765155352152aa11The Royal Proclamation of 1763 drew a line down the North American continent, reserving lands west of the Appalachian Mountains to Indigenous peoples. The action rewarded Indigenous allies, but enraged British-American colonists who saw it as Britain interfering in their futures.plain2020-10-07T14:23:18+00:00Library of CongressDaniel Samsone78c44be69204bf85874703732765155352152aa
This week's topic is very important - perhaps in our day and age the most important of all.
One of the things I hope you'll all take from this course is that the colonial world is not just something you might interesting, but that much it still has great practical importance in our world. In the late 17th century, and especially in the period after 1713, Britain signed a series of treaties with different Indigenous nations across what we today call Canada. There's no simple general rule as to what these meant, or what they were intended to do. In some, for example, it was intended to regulate hunting grounds, while in others land surrender was the explicit aim - in some it was explicitly a peace treaty ending a war, and others were broad agreements on "peace and friendship". They were signed in different places, by different people, at different times, and under different circumstances. That's what we'll be exploring in this module. Because there's no simple general rule as to what these meant, there's no simple general rule as to what they continue to mean. We can, however, see some common patterns and some common principles. Most importantly, however, they're all still in force. And so our question then is, what does that mean?
Belshaw doesn't offer much on treaties, so there's little further background reading from his text. But have a look at his discussion of the Seven Years War (section 6.11 and 7.2) to remind ourselves of the big picture in the 18th century.
There's a learning moment here: Belshaw, and historian at UBC, wrote this book for the Province of British Columbia's OpenText project. It has a purposefully western orientation to its focus. So, he has an extensive discussion of treaties in volume two of this textbook.
Seminar readings:
Primary Sources:
Two treaties, one from Nova Scotia in 1752 (i.e. before the Seven Years War) and one from Upper Canada (Ontario) in 1818 (i.e. after the American Revolution and the War of 1812). Read the texts carefully, but keep in mind their historical contexts.
Secondary source::
J. R. Miller, Compact, Contract, Covenant: Canada's Treaty-Making Heritage (Saskatoon, 2007), chapter 3.
Instructions:
This week we'll be reading some primary documents along with a single secondary source. Read Miller first, then read the primary sources. As you read the primary sources, look for examples/evidence that relates to Miller's discussion. This can be evidence that supports, or contradicts, what Miller is telling us
And, as you're reading the primary sources, ask yourself some questions:
What do these treaties say? What are the terms? Are they military (i.e. do they end a war)? Are they economic (i.e. do they outline terms for trade)? What do the two sides promise to do in these treaties?
What are the historical circumstances under which this document is being produced? That is, what events led to this moment? What context should we bring to our understanding of any of these documents?
Consider the framework I offered you in lecture. What types of treaty are these? Is their meaning clear? Are their purposes clear? Do you see certainties? Ambiguities?
As with all primary documents, you should consider the author's position. Who was the author of these documents? Obviously, you can't know who is the individual person, but you can see from which side they come. What does it mean that these treaties were written by settlers/colonisers? Can we see Indigenous positions in these texts?
These treaties are now the subject of numerous court cases. Many of these have turned on whether the treaties were restrictive (limiting what people could do) or positive (enabling activities). Where do you see restrictive or positive language?
In the lecture, I suggested that some people argue that the treaties surrendered land, but not rights to resources. Can you see such possibilities in any of these texts?
Can we see change over time? Do the later treaties look different than the earlier treaties? How can we explain that change?
